When the President of the Union of Concerned Scientists, Kevin Nobloch, spoke to an audience at the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies earlier this Summer (more here) on the subject of Global Warming, he very much emphasized the initiative of individual states as a means by which progress can be made while the Federal Government spins its tires, and does all that it does to suppress supporting scientific information. He did a very good job of talking about the spectrum of effects that global warming has on individual states, and the spectrum of activities that individual states can be engaged in, in order to take part in the effort to do something positive to help themselves. For example (bearing in mind the large number of ski-industry-related people in the audience), he spoke of the 3 degrees (F) average increase in temperature in places like Aspen over the last 25 years (1 degree for coastal regions, on average), and the resulting 20 snow days that have been lost over that time. He pointed out that this rate would give Aspen a climate approaching that of Amarillo, Texas, by the end of the century.
In talking about efforts that we can make, with regards to where we get our energy, and how we use our energy, he talked about several things. The USA is about twice as wasteful as Europe in this regard, and about half as efficient. So there are clearly lots of obviously attainable goals with existing technology. But he talked about the need to go further and focus on research into alternatives, reduction of emissions, and greater energy efficiencies. This is one of several ways in which states can make individual strides ahead, not waiting for the leadership of the Federal Government to arrive. 20 states already passed significant amount of legislature concerning renewable energy. 9 North East states already have regional cap and trade schemes on greenhouse gas emissons. Numerous city mayors have committed their municipalities to meet the Kyoto targets. 9 state governers joined California in more strict tailpipe emissions standards, etc. He talked about the need to do research and invest in the new industries that should arise around the technology of alternative energy, efficiency, etc. Why is the US not leading the way in hybrid car technology? Why is it so far behind? This is one of many areas to which states can be looking to invest, from the purely pragmatic perspective of attracting new industry, new jobs, new investment.
Well, we all know that California is leading the way in many areas. Not long ago we discussed the recent news of California’s commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by the year 2020. But, I have to admit, I did not anticipate a lawsuit as the next salvo in the battle! From the BBC (for example), in a report yesterday:
The state of California is suing six carmakers for costs associated with their cars’ greenhouse gas emissions.
The suit names General Motors, Toyota, Ford, Honda, Chrysler and Nissan.
California is asking for “monetary compensation” for the damage which it says their emissions are doing to health, economy and environment.
Further…
“Right now, global warming is harming California,” runs the state’s complaint.
“Human-induced global warming has, among other things, reduced California’s snow pack (a vital source of fresh water), caused an earlier melting of the snow pack, raised sea levels along California’s coastline, increased ozone pollution in urban areas, [and] increased the threat of wildfires.”
Wow. This is bold, and unlikely to work. But I like it. It makes a huge statement of what the issues are, and that in itself is of great importance at this time. But can it possibly actualy get anywhere?
State lawyers want any judgement for damages to be ongoing, so that manufacturers will be liable every year.
How similar is this to the case against the cigarette manufacturers, for example? It’s not clear to me that the case can be made sufficiently analogous (knowing hiding of the data concerning health effects, etc), in order to make it fly. And just to keep things entertaining, while we get on with the serious business of fixing our planet, we have:
Car manufacturers have their own case against California pending over laws requiring them to reduce emissions.
Sigh. This is going to be an interesting saga to watch.
-cvj
Pingback: bitacle.org