Phenoms Vs Strings: The Game

Here is my report on how the challenge was met.

Well, we started shortly after 5:00pm. About 14 people were present, which was fun since everybody rotated in periorically, to give everyone a touch of the ball. This was welcome rest for the people who rotated out as well. Remember that we are at altitude here…. it takes a lot of effort to do physical things which would be much more trivial at sea level, the altitude we’re all more used to.

The Phenoms had people like Csaba Csaki, Jushua Erlich, Dan Pratt, Hsin-Chia Cheng, and Carlos Wagner and another couple of people whose names I’ll try to get for you…

The Strings deployed our main secret weapon, David Kutasov, along with solid offensive support from, Ofer Aharony and Jaume Gomis. With that trio up front, we should have been safe all the time…

David Kutasov with Ball
… but the Phenoms had some strong opposition, which meant that we had our work cut out for us. With David Berenstein, Jason Kumar (who can also actually shoot consistenly and so kept the other side guessing) and myself trying to move the ball around to feed it to our people at the front, both teams kept within one point of each other for most of the game.

We’d started playing half-court, since there was another game going on….

David Kutasov shoots ball
… but eventually (for better or worse) we moved to full court after the others left, which allowed more people to play at the same time. Then we faced the biggest enemy of all, the running at altitude:

The Running.... the running.....

This wore us all down, and I think the problem was that by time a team would get the ball all the way up to the other basket, they’d be too tired to focus on a good combination to force a score. So there were several rather wild shots and wasted opportunities on both sides, but we did have fun, which was the point! Sometimes we did do some good combinations, to be fair, but we still did not always finish. The breath and legs of our star shooters were beginning to fail, and so those jumpshots and drives to the basket were low on the percentage success rates.

At some point, we realized that nobody had been keeping track of the score for a while (this led to jokes about us fiddling around with all sorts of fancy strategies with nobody worrying about the actual measurements), and so since we were probably within a point of each other, we all agreed that we’d reset to an matched score of 0-0 and play on, keeping track from there on. This was about the same time that the Strings started getting things together. We had a couple of great fast break attempts, one of which came off, but more tellingly for the long term we started getting lots more rebound attempts, whcih compensated for our low shot percentage. (After we had a point where Jaume Gomis and David Kutasov managed to get a point after several attempts back and forth between them under the basket, I made a joke attempt about 10^500 vacua as we ran back…. I don’t think David was amused….!)

In this way, the Strings pulled to two points ahead, and we were looking good.

But rain stopped play:

Merciful Relief... Rain Stopped Play

It came down steadily for a long while, and so we gave up. Someone looked at their watch while we waited, and discovered that we’d only been playing for 45 minutes!! It felt like two hours of play, as we all kept having to rest so much.

To be fair, I think both teams were evenly matched, and it should be declared a draw. Two points ahead is not enough to know if we’d have won, since the Phenoms could well have started making adjustments that could have snatched back that lead.

So there you have it. Did it fit with your expectations, or were you surprised by the result?

-cvj

Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Phenoms Vs Strings: The Game

  1. Pingback: AdS Vs CMT at Asymptotia

  2. Pingback: Letting Off Steam - Asymptotia

  3. Clifford says:

    Pyracantha, er….. no.

    If there is only a small pool of women at the workshops that week to begin with, then -once you’ve allowed for the percentage of any population of any gender who wants to come out to play a game of any sort- measuring the number of them that turn out to play basketball does not tell you anything more than you already knew:- There are not enough women in the field.

    It does not work the other way around, however: You cannot conclude based on this observation that if more women played basketball they would stay longer in the field. Well, you can conclude it, but it would be an incorrect conclusion….

    Cheers,

    -cvj

  4. Pyracantha says:

    All male cast, it looks like.

    Maybe one of the things that is needed for women to do better in physics careers, is to teach them to play basketball.

  5. a cornellian says:

    Go Csaba Csaki !

    (he is one of my favorite profs at cornell)

  6. Aaron F. says:

    At some point, we realized that nobody had been keeping track of the score for a while…

    Theorists all the way! 😉

    …and so since we were probably within a point of each other, we all agreed that we’d reset to an matched score of 0-0.

    Back in high school, that would’ve surprised me… but that was before I saw a full professor cross out a board full of higher-order terms, and then decide that 6 was approximately equal to 10.

    Two points ahead is not enough to know if we’d have won.

    Gotta agree with you there, assuming basketball is Poisson process. Fortunately, today is Friday, the world’s official day off from statistics… which means the Strings can feel free to declare victory! 🙂

  7. anon. says:

    You know, Josh Erlich has been known to respond to the name “Dr. J.” I guess he doesn’t live up to it!