Been a while since I shared a snippet from the graphic book in progress. And this time the dialogue is not redacted! A few remarks:
(1) New characters. ‘Cos…. new story. They’re facing each other on a train journey. Hence the fancy chairs.
(2) I’m actually just roughing out this story, but I got the urge to do a more fully rendered version of a panel I like.
(3) This is also an experiment: I’ve skipped the inking stage entirely here – the black stuff is actually my raw pencils. It turned out rather well. Some of those easy soft suggestions of texture and half-tone come out quite readily. Very tempting to abandon inking entirely for this story and continue in this style.
(4) Just for fun, here is the rough panel triptych that this is based upon:
That’s all.
-cvj
Herbi Dreiner liked this on Facebook.
Hi,
I think there are weak links in several parts of the chain there. I don’t see the statement “some form of supergravity should exist” as compelling. Is there a strong argument for that? other than it follows “naturally” in some sense? (Assuming things like locality, notions like local field theory, etc, hold through a lot of scales…. No new fundamental length scales show up, etc…) And then let’s say you have some supergravity model coupled to a Susy standard model… I know of no proof that the only completion is into a string theory. Again, we’d say it is maybe the only thing we know that works as a completion, but that not a proof that there is no other parent theory… In other words, discovery of Susy would be a strong encouragement that strings might have something to do with nature, but nothing like a proof. In my opinion…. Maybe there are new facts in the market I missed, but until I hear of new arguments for the chain’s strength, that’s the state of affairs, I’d say.
-cvj
Clifford, I would like to ask you a string theory question, if that’s alright.
Is it true that if SUSY is discovered, that some form of supergravity should exist? If true, and if supergravity’s completion is string theory, would that mean string theory gets shown to be true? I suspect that only a certain form of supergravity has its completion in string theory, and that form has nothing to do with our universe. Is that correct? If so, then that kinda sucks… 🙁
Thanks!
Louie Tucci liked this on Facebook.
Agatha French liked this on Facebook.
Ronda Gómez-Quiñones liked this on Facebook.
Karen E Bender liked this on Facebook.
Louie, Amy -Thanks! Glad you like it.
Sarah – very nice of you to say that. Thanks.
YOU ARE TOO MUCH – this is beautiful work!
Don’t say that outloud, Clifford! The boy might hear you and decide to start waking us up again!
Ronda – Hi! The usual times, I think. Actually I think I’ve rather been overdoing the whole sleep thing recently…
I have one question: When do you sleep?
Clifford Johnson is a man of many talents! 🙂
Ajm Zoron liked this on Facebook.
Shamit Kachru liked this on Facebook.
(Upgrade-related test repeat of previous blog post update. Sorry for the noise everyone…) http://t.co/n7X1f9Su3h
(Finally got the share attachment to work properly. Sheesh. For those who care, og:image in meta kept being a random variable….)
Lynell George liked this on Facebook.
Robert Anthony Siegel liked this on Facebook.
Amy French liked this on Facebook.
Thanks Lynell !
these are really great….
Mid-Conversation… http://t.co/PQ2CBSxgpm via @Asymptotia