So, I don’t know why, but in addition to the catalogues I get in my work mailbox from publishers of physics books or lab equipment, I’ve started getting a lot about books in the Humanities and related subjects. Is this because those publishers know of my tendency to dabble in other subject? I’ve no idea. In any case, all of those things tend to end up pretty swiftly in the recycling bin nearest the department mailboxes. A suite of lovely new books on teaching Art History is about as valuable to me as a shiny sets of vacuum pumps or electronic controllers. I’ll admit to sometimes looking through and longing for the time I’d need in order to explore such things (vacuum pumps or Art History texts)… but then into the bin they go.
Well, earlier this week a catalogue arrived and one might be forgiven for thinking that they are really trying to get my attention with this one. It is a catalogue of Gender and Sexuality texts from Ashgate, and if the image on the cover is representative (uh, as far as I know it is not!) they’ve really developed some fancy techniques in the field!
Some of the formulae are hilarious! (And I’m trying to understand the, obviously important, inequality right in the middle…)
Link to larger version of image here.
(Actually, a bit of digging showed that the drawing (I did a low-res scan to show it to you – I can’t bring myself to post unlicensed high-res images of other people’s work) is entitled “Formula of Love”, by Martin Wimmer, and is available at istockphoto, in case the scientist readers among you might be thinking this would be an awesome ironic Valentine’s Day card for next year.)
-cvj
http://t.co/1njD1mrw0j
RT @BlackPhysicists: The Calculus of Gender and Sexuality? http://t.co/O2sJijdWOF via @Asymptotia
The Calculus of Gender and Sexuality? http://t.co/O2sJijdWOF via @Asymptotia
RT @asymptotia: The Calculus of Gender and Sexuality?: So, I don’t know why, but in addition to the catalogues I get in m… http://t.co/Do…