Known Unknowns Decreased a Bit

Well, the day is here. The Planck collaboration has announced a huge amount of results for the consumption of the scientific community and the media today. The Planck satellite looks with unprecedented precision at the very earliest radiation (“cosmic microwave background radiation”, CMB) from the universe when it was very young (a wee, cute 380,000 years old) and helps us deduce many things about what the universe was like then, and what it is like now. Here’s one of the representations of the universe using the new sky mapping Planck did (image courtesy ESA/Planck):

There’s a ton of data, and a raft of papers with analysis and conclusions. And there’s a very nice press release. I recommend looking at it. It is here, and the papers are here. The title of the press release is “Planck reveals an almost perfect Universe”, and some of the excitement is in the “almost” part. A number of anomalies that were hinted at by the previous explorer of the CMB, WMAP, seem to have been confirmed by Planck, and so there are some important things to be understood in order to figure out the origin of the anomalies (if they ultimately turn out to be real physics and not data artefacts). [Update: Andrew Jaffe has two nice posts I recommend. One on the science, and the other on the PR. Jester also has a nice post on the science from a particle physicist’s perspective.]

What is the title of my post referring to? Well, the refined measurements have allowed us to update some of the vital statistics of the universe. First, it is a bit older than previous measurements have indicated. The age is now measured as 13.82 billion years. (I’m already updating pages in the draft of my book…) Second, the proportion of ingredients of the universe are now updated a bit, and the interesting news is that there’s a bit more of the known stuff (ordinary matter and energy we’re familiar with) than previously thought. The amount of dark energy is a tad less than before… Dark Energy and Dark matter are the subjects of research, to figure out exactly what they are, but we know they are there and a lot of what they do, so hence the term “known unknowns”. See the European Space Agency (ESA/Planck) figure above.

Exciting stuff!


Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Known Unknowns Decreased a Bit

  1. Yvette says:

    Based on the latest results, I really want to start a “we are the 4.9%!” campaign. 🙂

  2. Clifford says:

    Brilliant! A great new T-shirt design is in order!


  3. Clifford Johnson says:

    Greetings from the other Clifford Johnson, ive seen u on the history channel! My email is linked to this post, If you have any research,links, or information regarding scalar electromagnetic radiation, or potential ideas for ion propulsion engines I’d be very interested!