<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Southern California Strings Seminar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asymptotia.com/2008/12/02/southern-california-strings-seminar-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asymptotia.com/2008/12/02/southern-california-strings-seminar-5/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JT Arbuckle</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2008/12/02/southern-california-strings-seminar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-127830</link>
		<dc:creator>JT Arbuckle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/?p=2712#comment-127830</guid>
		<description>Gravity Dual of a Quantum Hall Transition:

I'm new at this, please help.

Was there a misprint? Duel for dual...a competition for gravitons' affect and effect in transition (a duel)...or merely a duality (+/- focus) of gravitons and antigravitons, for example?

While I may have your attention, is the limit to infinity (which cannot be, in itself, a limit, by definition) of the asymptote 'proof' that one cannot know or calculate with certainty integrated hypotheses?

Thanks, JTA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gravity Dual of a Quantum Hall Transition:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new at this, please help.</p>
<p>Was there a misprint? Duel for dual&#8230;a competition for gravitons&#8217; affect and effect in transition (a duel)&#8230;or merely a duality (+/- focus) of gravitons and antigravitons, for example?</p>
<p>While I may have your attention, is the limit to infinity (which cannot be, in itself, a limit, by definition) of the asymptote &#8216;proof&#8217; that one cannot know or calculate with certainty integrated hypotheses?</p>
<p>Thanks, JTA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Stacey</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2008/12/02/southern-california-strings-seminar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-127793</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/?p=2712#comment-127793</guid>
		<description>Ah, well.  So it goes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, well.  So it goes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2008/12/02/southern-california-strings-seminar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-127783</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/?p=2712#comment-127783</guid>
		<description>Er.. They (i.e., I) have no plans to record this time.

Sorry.

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er.. They (i.e., I) have no plans to record this time.</p>
<p>Sorry.</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Stacey</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2008/12/02/southern-california-strings-seminar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-127781</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/?p=2712#comment-127781</guid>
		<description>So far away. . . they won't be putting videos of these talks online by any chance, will they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far away. . . they won&#8217;t be putting videos of these talks online by any chance, will they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2008/12/02/southern-california-strings-seminar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-127763</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/?p=2712#comment-127763</guid>
		<description>Non-relativistic. See my post about strings and cold atomic gases &lt;a href="http://asymptotia.com/2008/07/21/atoms-and-strings-in-the-laboratory/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. (To state the correspondence, the "AdS" part should also be adjusted... but anyway...)


-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-relativistic. See my post about strings and cold atomic gases <a href="http://asymptotia.com/2008/07/21/atoms-and-strings-in-the-laboratory/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. (To state the correspondence, the &#8220;AdS&#8221; part should also be adjusted&#8230; but anyway&#8230;)</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Tarabour</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2008/12/02/southern-california-strings-seminar-5/comment-page-1/#comment-127762</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Tarabour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/?p=2712#comment-127762</guid>
		<description>quick question. What is the "NR" in the AdS/NRCFT correspondence. I have never seen that term before?

thanks,

e.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quick question. What is the &#8220;NR&#8221; in the AdS/NRCFT correspondence. I have never seen that term before?</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
<p>e.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
