However, cosmic rays strike relatively stationary objects and results travel too fast to be captured by Earths gravity, while colliders smash particles head on, may focus all energy to a single point and can be captured by Earths gravity. Einsteins relativity theory predicts that micro black holes will not decay but instead only grow, and Hawking Radiation contradicts relativity, is unproven and is disputed by at least 3 peer reviewed studies that find no basis in science to support it.

The LHC Safety Assessment Group has been trying for months to prove safety without success. However science may still be a few years away from being able to provide reasonable assurance of safety or not at least with respect to creation of micro black holes on Earth.

Professor Dr. Otto E. Rössler (winner University of Liège Chaos Award and René Descartes Award), Dr. Raj Baldev (Director of the Indira Gandhi Center for Atomic Research) and others are warning of a very real, very possible, very present danger to the planet from the Large Hadron Collider. Dr. Rössler predicts that a single microblackhole could destroy the planet in as little and 50 months. His calculations have been released for peer review.

If this experiment is so safe, why arent CERN scientists allowed to express any personal fears they might have about this Collider?

Alleged in the legal action: Chief Scientific Officer, Mr. Engelen passed an internal memorandum to workers at CERN, asking them, regardless of personal opinion, to affirm in all interviews that there were no risks involved in the experiments, changing the previous assertion of minimal risk. (Statisticians generally consider minimal risk as 1-10%).

Previous safety studies ruled out any possibility of creating microblackholes in a collider. But predictions have changed and CERN has estimated the possibility of creating 1 microblackhole per second in the Large Hadron Collider. No peer reviewed safety study has ever been produced that I am aware of that speaks to the safety of creating microblackholes on Earth.

If we delay for a safety study, some scientists at CERN may not be the first to discover some new science, and some Nobel prizes may be at stake.
But which would more wise, conduct a full and independent adversarial peer reviewed safety study first, or just turn it on now and discover science as quickly as humanly possible?

JTankers
LHCConcerns.com

What is most worry some to me is how few people are aware of the danger, and how quickly most people are to put their trust in those scientists who run the experiments, a trust which is not fully justified in my opinion based on actions that appear to be more focused on public relations and preventing delay of collider operation startup rather than open and honest risk assessment, debate and an objective search for truth with respect to probability of danger as best that science can predict particularly with respect to micro black hole creation and capture by Earth’s gravity. (Previous RHIC safety studies limited the safety discussion related to micro black hole creation to the fact that it was not believed possible to create micro black holes at collider energy levels, however these predictions have changed as we know, and even CERN has predicted the possibility of creating up to 1 microblackhole per second at Large Hadron Collider energy levels, under conditions dis-similar in numerous ways to cosmic ray collisions with Earth, which may tend to make the Large Hadron Collider soon to be possibly the micro black hole factory in our galaxy.).

I tend to believe Professor Rossler’s prediction that the time frame between creation of a slow moving stable micro black hole and the total accretion or destruction of our planet may be closer to 50 months, primarily because this is what Professor Rossler of Germany has predicted and published calculations to support, and because I have faith in his proven genius in many fields of science including being the foremost scientist in the field of chaos theory. Professor Rossler’s micro black hole growth rate equations have been released for peer review. http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/OTTOROESSLERMINIBLACKHOLE.pdf

JTankers
LHCConcerns.com

-cvj

e.