http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/14/gell-mann-on-fundamental-law/ Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:10:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/14/gell-mann-on-fundamental-law/comment-page-1/#comment-113173 Upendra Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:38:19 +0000 http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/14/gell-mann-on-fundamental-law/#comment-113173 Well, as I understand, what Prof. Gell-Mann was saying is that whether or not we (humans) see this "beauty", it always exhists in the nature as a fundamental law. Well, as I understand, what Prof. Gell-Mann was saying is that whether or not we (humans) see this “beauty”, it always exhists in the nature as a fundamental law.

]]> http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/14/gell-mann-on-fundamental-law/comment-page-1/#comment-97853 Carl Brannen Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:22:59 +0000 http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/14/gell-mann-on-fundamental-law/#comment-97853 My problem with symmetry as a foundation for physics is that symmetry / beauty is the first thing that humans notice about anything. So how can we distinguish between symmetry, as seen inside our heads, and symmetry as existing in nature? My problem with symmetry as a foundation for physics is that symmetry / beauty is the first thing that humans notice about anything. So how can we distinguish between symmetry, as seen inside our heads, and symmetry as existing in nature?

]]>