<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Science Debate 2008 on Science Friday - Asymptotia</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-103901</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Debate 2008 on Science Friday - Asymptotia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-103901</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a quick note to let you know that today&#8217;s Science Friday will feature the Science Debate 2008: Friday, January 11th, 2008 Hour One- 2pm EDT The Call for A Science Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a quick note to let you know that today&#8217;s Science Friday will feature the Science Debate 2008: Friday, January 11th, 2008 Hour One- 2pm EDT The Call for A Science Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Bora - Science Debate 2008 &#124; Tangled Up in Blue Guy</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-97424</link>
		<dc:creator>More Bora - Science Debate 2008 &#124; Tangled Up in Blue Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-97424</guid>
		<description>[...] Science Debate 08 Questions for the presidential candidates: where do you stand on science? Let&#8217;s have a debate on science policy Science Debate 2008 Science Debate 2008 Presidential Debates: The Future of Science in America Call for a Science Debate A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Science Debate! Rattling the Presidential Science Debate Cage Lets hear the candidates debate their solutions for global warming Let&#8217;s Have a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Presidential Science Debate The Great Science Debate A call for a debate A Great Idea: A Science and Technology Policy Debate A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Presidential debates with an extra helping of science A presidential science debate? Science Debate 2008 &#8212; Do We Need It? Let&#8217;s make a date for a debate We Want a Presidential Science Debate A Call for a Science Debate ScienceDebate2008 It Is Time For A Presidential Debate On Science We Want a Presidential Debate on Science! Wait a Minute&#8230; Why Isn&#8217;t There a Sci/Tech Specific Debate for the Presidential Candidates? Science Debate 2008 Sciencedebate 2008 Shouldn&#8217;t the presidential candidates have a debate on science?! Sciencedebate 2008 Presidential debate focused on science &#38; technology Should there be a Presidential Debate about Science? Let&#8217;s have a presidential science debate! A presidential debate about science Science Debate 08 Sciencedebate 2008 Science Debate 2008 - Just Say &#8216;Yes!&#8217; A Science-Only Debate For the 2008 Presidential Candidates? ScienceDebate2008 Looking ahead in political science In This Evening&#8217;s Debate We Will Be Focusing on Science You Want the Presidency? Let&#8217;s Talk Some Science. Science Debate Do Politicians Understand Science at All? Dispatches from the Emerging Technoprogressive Mainstream Calling for a science debate Presidential Candidate&#8217;s Science, Technology, and Energy Positions Call for a Presidential Science Debate Better Smart than Dumb Group calls for presidential science debate A matter of debate Science Debate 2008 Call for a Presidential Science Debate The Unforgiving Nature of Objective Reality Since we don&#8217;t have a science blog&#8230; Let&#8217;s Have Them Debate Science Before They End It Join the Debate Uncommon Ground Science debate 2008 Political Science Science Debate 2008 Science Debate 2008 SCIENCE DEBATE A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Presidential Science Debate? Science Debate 2008 Sciencedebate 2008 Si los polÃƒÂ­ticos debatieran sobre ciencia Citizen Scientists Political Issues and the Science Lobby Krauss joins top scientists in call for special presidential debate Debates Worth Having Presidential Science Debate One More Time Bali, Global Warming in the Midwest, a Science Debate and More A good idea whose time has come We Need A Presidential Debate On Science! Science Debate 2008, and Krauss on Science and the Presidential Campaign Undecided&#8230; Znanost v ameriÃ…Â¡ki predvolilni tekmi Science debate 2008 Sciencedebate2008 A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Sciencedebate 2008 Presidential Science Debate? Science Debate? Let&#8217;s get the politicians talking about science A science debate, not a science exam Support the push for a Sci/Tech Presidential Debate in &#8216;08 A solution to the stem cell restrictions Science and the Presidential candidates Think outside Schrodinger&#8217;s box Support the push for a Sci/Tech Presidential Debate in &#8216;08 Let the candidates debate science! Science Debate 2008 Time for a Presidential Science Debate Science Debate 2008 Science Debate: It&#8217;s about time! EnviroHealth in Blogs: Calling all candidates! Science Debate 2008: Shockwave in the Blogosphere Krauss and Mooney in LA Times Would it be better to drop &#8216;Science&#8217; and use the c-word instead? A REAL Debate Best Science Rant Make science part of the debate Science is Life Call for Presidential Science Debate A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Policy Chapman and Kirshenbaum on HuffingtonPost Make science part of the 2008 Presidential debate Science Debate 2008 Debating Science and Technology Presidential debating points: How about science and technology? The Huffington Post It Is Time For A Presidential Debate On Science - Part II More on the Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Policy Republicans talk climate change (maybe) - and a call for real science debate Presidential Science Debate Science Debate 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Science Debate 08 Questions for the presidential candidates: where do you stand on science? Let&#8217;s have a debate on science policy Science Debate 2008 Science Debate 2008 Presidential Debates: The Future of Science in America Call for a Science Debate A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Science Debate! Rattling the Presidential Science Debate Cage Lets hear the candidates debate their solutions for global warming Let&#8217;s Have a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Presidential Science Debate The Great Science Debate A call for a debate A Great Idea: A Science and Technology Policy Debate A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Presidential debates with an extra helping of science A presidential science debate? Science Debate 2008 &#8212; Do We Need It? Let&#8217;s make a date for a debate We Want a Presidential Science Debate A Call for a Science Debate ScienceDebate2008 It Is Time For A Presidential Debate On Science We Want a Presidential Debate on Science! Wait a Minute&#8230; Why Isn&#8217;t There a Sci/Tech Specific Debate for the Presidential Candidates? Science Debate 2008 Sciencedebate 2008 Shouldn&#8217;t the presidential candidates have a debate on science?! Sciencedebate 2008 Presidential debate focused on science &amp; technology Should there be a Presidential Debate about Science? Let&#8217;s have a presidential science debate! A presidential debate about science Science Debate 08 Sciencedebate 2008 Science Debate 2008 - Just Say &#8216;Yes!&#8217; A Science-Only Debate For the 2008 Presidential Candidates? ScienceDebate2008 Looking ahead in political science In This Evening&#8217;s Debate We Will Be Focusing on Science You Want the Presidency? Let&#8217;s Talk Some Science. Science Debate Do Politicians Understand Science at All? Dispatches from the Emerging Technoprogressive Mainstream Calling for a science debate Presidential Candidate&#8217;s Science, Technology, and Energy Positions Call for a Presidential Science Debate Better Smart than Dumb Group calls for presidential science debate A matter of debate Science Debate 2008 Call for a Presidential Science Debate The Unforgiving Nature of Objective Reality Since we don&#8217;t have a science blog&#8230; Let&#8217;s Have Them Debate Science Before They End It Join the Debate Uncommon Ground Science debate 2008 Political Science Science Debate 2008 Science Debate 2008 SCIENCE DEBATE A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Presidential Science Debate? Science Debate 2008 Sciencedebate 2008 Si los polÃƒÂ­ticos debatieran sobre ciencia Citizen Scientists Political Issues and the Science Lobby Krauss joins top scientists in call for special presidential debate Debates Worth Having Presidential Science Debate One More Time Bali, Global Warming in the Midwest, a Science Debate and More A good idea whose time has come We Need A Presidential Debate On Science! Science Debate 2008, and Krauss on Science and the Presidential Campaign Undecided&#8230; Znanost v ameriÃ…Â¡ki predvolilni tekmi Science debate 2008 Sciencedebate2008 A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Sciencedebate 2008 Presidential Science Debate? Science Debate? Let&#8217;s get the politicians talking about science A science debate, not a science exam Support the push for a Sci/Tech Presidential Debate in &#8216;08 A solution to the stem cell restrictions Science and the Presidential candidates Think outside Schrodinger&#8217;s box Support the push for a Sci/Tech Presidential Debate in &#8216;08 Let the candidates debate science! Science Debate 2008 Time for a Presidential Science Debate Science Debate 2008 Science Debate: It&#8217;s about time! EnviroHealth in Blogs: Calling all candidates! Science Debate 2008: Shockwave in the Blogosphere Krauss and Mooney in LA Times Would it be better to drop &#8216;Science&#8217; and use the c-word instead? A REAL Debate Best Science Rant Make science part of the debate Science is Life Call for Presidential Science Debate A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Policy Chapman and Kirshenbaum on HuffingtonPost Make science part of the 2008 Presidential debate Science Debate 2008 Debating Science and Technology Presidential debating points: How about science and technology? The Huffington Post It Is Time For A Presidential Debate On Science - Part II More on the Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Policy Republicans talk climate change (maybe) - and a call for real science debate Presidential Science Debate Science Debate 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog Around The Clock</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-97067</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog Around The Clock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-97067</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Let's get the Presidential candidates to debate science topics...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sheril Kirshenbaum and Chris Mooney have been promising something for a week, teasing us with tantalizing hints about something big. We were told to read Chris' article Dr.President, and then this morning another article, Science and the Candidates by...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Let&#8217;s get the Presidential candidates to debate science topics&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sheril Kirshenbaum and Chris Mooney have been promising something for a week, teasing us with tantalizing hints about something big. We were told to read Chris&#8217; article Dr.President, and then this morning another article, Science and the Candidates by&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheQuantumPoet</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-96975</link>
		<dc:creator>TheQuantumPoet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-96975</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing to the The Intersection blog.  Science, O' Science how art thou not discussed in these Presidential debates and interviews?  People are so obsessed in learning about the nitty-gritty of the personal lives of the candidates that the real issues such as the economy, weak dollar, health insurance, social security and of course science are getting far less talk-time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing to the The Intersection blog.  Science, O&#8217; Science how art thou not discussed in these Presidential debates and interviews?  People are so obsessed in learning about the nitty-gritty of the personal lives of the candidates that the real issues such as the economy, weak dollar, health insurance, social security and of course science are getting far less talk-time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvette</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-96953</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-96953</guid>
		<description>Been hearing Professor Krauss talk about this all last week. He wrote an editorial in The Wall Street Journal on this very issue that appeared last Thursday, which I'd link to but I think you need a subscription to read.

Hope it happens though as it would definitely be a refreshing sight to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been hearing Professor Krauss talk about this all last week. He wrote an editorial in The Wall Street Journal on this very issue that appeared last Thursday, which I&#8217;d link to but I think you need a subscription to read.</p>
<p>Hope it happens though as it would definitely be a refreshing sight to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrrationalPoint</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-96896</link>
		<dc:creator>IrrationalPoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-96896</guid>
		<description>Excellent.  I'm not clear though, on whether they want the signatories to be professional scientists or whether interested individuals are encouraged to sign too?  I couldn't find where to view a list of individuals, so wasn't sure if this was because they haven't signed yet or because they aren't supposed to.

But yes, this is definitely an important area of debate.

--IP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent.  I&#8217;m not clear though, on whether they want the signatories to be professional scientists or whether interested individuals are encouraged to sign too?  I couldn&#8217;t find where to view a list of individuals, so wasn&#8217;t sure if this was because they haven&#8217;t signed yet or because they aren&#8217;t supposed to.</p>
<p>But yes, this is definitely an important area of debate.</p>
<p>&#8211;IP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyder</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-96889</link>
		<dc:creator>spyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/12/10/political-science/#comment-96889</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What do you think?&lt;/i&gt; 
Do we need a multi-candidate debate focused on science issues??  Absofreakinglutely!!!!  I believe Gore said something along those lines this morning in his speech to the Nobel ceremony attendees, suggesting that so far none of the debates (GOP nor Democratic) have had serious questions asked about climate change policies.  

Instead we have Oprah reprising MLK's dream for Obama, a wing and a prayer; Guiliani suggesting that it was perfectly reasonable to ask the Secret Service to protect a President's mistress to the same degree and extent as the President's wife; Romney saying that there is (or maybe not) a need to ignore Article VI of the US Constitution; Hillary hiding in CA; and so forth.  Where is our real future being discussed???  Then again, there was that Rasmussen poll over the weekend that showed that only 18% of US citizens thought that the NIE on Iran was accurate in stating the same thing that the world's nuclear scientists have been saying for the last four years.  I shudder to think that eight out of ten of my fellow citizens could be stupid????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What do you think?</i><br />
Do we need a multi-candidate debate focused on science issues??  Absofreakinglutely!!!!  I believe Gore said something along those lines this morning in his speech to the Nobel ceremony attendees, suggesting that so far none of the debates (GOP nor Democratic) have had serious questions asked about climate change policies.  </p>
<p>Instead we have Oprah reprising MLK&#8217;s dream for Obama, a wing and a prayer; Guiliani suggesting that it was perfectly reasonable to ask the Secret Service to protect a President&#8217;s mistress to the same degree and extent as the President&#8217;s wife; Romney saying that there is (or maybe not) a need to ignore Article VI of the US Constitution; Hillary hiding in CA; and so forth.  Where is our real future being discussed???  Then again, there was that Rasmussen poll over the weekend that showed that only 18% of US citizens thought that the NIE on Iran was accurate in stating the same thing that the world&#8217;s nuclear scientists have been saying for the last four years.  I shudder to think that eight out of ten of my fellow citizens could be stupid????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
