<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MiniBooNE for Neutrinos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/#comment-39271</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 23:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/#comment-39271</guid>
		<description>Thanks JoAnne! (and Hi!)

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks JoAnne! (and Hi!)</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoAnne</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/#comment-39195</link>
		<dc:creator>JoAnne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/#comment-39195</guid>
		<description>Hi Bee,

You are right - LSND ran with anti-neutrino beams and it is possible that something could be going on with potential CPT violation which would give a different result for neutrino versus anti-neutrino beams.  To test this, MiniBooNE is running with anti-neutrino beams right now.   Their initial run(s) was with neutrino beams simply because it is easier to make a large flux with neutrino beams versus anti-neutrino beams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bee,</p>
<p>You are right - LSND ran with anti-neutrino beams and it is possible that something could be going on with potential CPT violation which would give a different result for neutrino versus anti-neutrino beams.  To test this, MiniBooNE is running with anti-neutrino beams right now.   Their initial run(s) was with neutrino beams simply because it is easier to make a large flux with neutrino beams versus anti-neutrino beams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/#comment-38951</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/#comment-38951</guid>
		<description>Hi Bee,

No I don't know what they chose to do it that way. I've no expertise on that experiment, I'm afraid.

Yes, I'm sure some people will continue to speculate.

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bee,</p>
<p>No I don&#8217;t know what they chose to do it that way. I&#8217;ve no expertise on that experiment, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m sure some people will continue to speculate.</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/#comment-38561</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2007/04/11/miniboone-for-neutrinos/#comment-38561</guid>
		<description>Hi Clifford,

thanks! So they did \nu_\mu -&#62; \nu_e and not actually the same as LSND? Why did they do that? I mean, now people will go on trying to find an explanation for LSND based on \nu anti-\nu asymmetry instead of sterile neutrinos, don't you think? Best,

B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clifford,</p>
<p>thanks! So they did \nu_\mu -&gt; \nu_e and not actually the same as LSND? Why did they do that? I mean, now people will go on trying to find an explanation for LSND based on \nu anti-\nu asymmetry instead of sterile neutrinos, don&#8217;t you think? Best,</p>
<p>B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
