<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attack of the Clones?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Uitti</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-23328</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Uitti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-23328</guid>
		<description>I've recently learned that domestic turkey can't breed except by artificial insemination.  That's because through breeding over the years, they have such a large breast that they can't do the mount.  Pretty silly.  One could say that these turkeys are very successful under domestication by humans.  But when humans go the way of the dinosaur, so do the turkeys.

At least we still have wild turkeys.

Gobble gobble.

When the current uncontrolled Climate Change experiment is over, it will be us and the turkeys.  The whole of the Earth will be unrecognizable.  What bothers me is that the Biosphere II experiment failed.  That is, it turned out to be unsustainable.  And that was a controlled experiment.  What we like to do with important controlled experiments like Biosphere II is de-fund them.  We can get to Mars without it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently learned that domestic turkey can&#8217;t breed except by artificial insemination.  That&#8217;s because through breeding over the years, they have such a large breast that they can&#8217;t do the mount.  Pretty silly.  One could say that these turkeys are very successful under domestication by humans.  But when humans go the way of the dinosaur, so do the turkeys.</p>
<p>At least we still have wild turkeys.</p>
<p>Gobble gobble.</p>
<p>When the current uncontrolled Climate Change experiment is over, it will be us and the turkeys.  The whole of the Earth will be unrecognizable.  What bothers me is that the Biosphere II experiment failed.  That is, it turned out to be unsustainable.  And that was a controlled experiment.  What we like to do with important controlled experiments like Biosphere II is de-fund them.  We can get to Mars without it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-23287</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-23287</guid>
		<description>Jerry Crowther:- Thanks, but I think you're missing the point I was making.

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry Crowther:- Thanks, but I think you&#8217;re missing the point I was making.</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Crowther</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-23276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Crowther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-23276</guid>
		<description>Whether or not the meat or its byproducts are from cloned animals makes no difference to me. How do you think cattle are reproduced now? Artificial insemination. Last time I bought a filet mignon, there was no â€˜warning labelâ€™ about the evils of non natural procreation. Cloning is no different. IMHO, itâ€™s preferred. The cattle farmer can pick and choose his very best cattle, and reproduce it indefinitely, and I can have the same tasty cut every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not the meat or its byproducts are from cloned animals makes no difference to me. How do you think cattle are reproduced now? Artificial insemination. Last time I bought a filet mignon, there was no â€˜warning labelâ€™ about the evils of non natural procreation. Cloning is no different. IMHO, itâ€™s preferred. The cattle farmer can pick and choose his very best cattle, and reproduce it indefinitely, and I can have the same tasty cut every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22881</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22881</guid>
		<description>"Some companies are already planning ways in which to optimise their opposition to using modified foods. A spokesman for Ben &#38; Jerry's said it planned to make clear that its products would not include produce from cloned animals. "

from:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1229-01.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some companies are already planning ways in which to optimise their opposition to using modified foods. A spokesman for Ben &amp; Jerry&#8217;s said it planned to make clear that its products would not include produce from cloned animals. &#8221;</p>
<p>from:<br />
<a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1229-01.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1229-01.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyder</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22827</link>
		<dc:creator>spyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22827</guid>
		<description>Want to trust the government to make sound choices and good decisions about the scientific merits of cloning and labelling of food products?  Look no further than this horrific story:&lt;a href="http://www.attytood.com/2006/12/weird_science.html" rel="nofollow"&gt; â€œGrand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate&lt;/a&gt; of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees. Despite promising a prompt review of its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by Noahâ€™s flood rather than by geologic forces, more than three years later no review has ever been done and the book remains on sale at the park.â€</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to trust the government to make sound choices and good decisions about the scientific merits of cloning and labelling of food products?  Look no further than this horrific story:<a href="http://www.attytood.com/2006/12/weird_science.html" rel="nofollow"> â€œGrand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate</a> of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees. Despite promising a prompt review of its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by Noahâ€™s flood rather than by geologic forces, more than three years later no review has ever been done and the book remains on sale at the park.â€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22817</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22817</guid>
		<description>Presumably the industry does not want to deal with the cost of information, unless there is a benefit.  If there is consumer demand for non-cloned, "happy" animal meat, or a premium chargeable for such then the industry will provide it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably the industry does not want to deal with the cost of information, unless there is a benefit.  If there is consumer demand for non-cloned, &#8220;happy&#8221; animal meat, or a premium chargeable for such then the industry will provide it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyder</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22756</link>
		<dc:creator>spyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22756</guid>
		<description>Giving up the eating of most meat and fish, as well as any non-organic dairy (and organic must be California certified as the rest of the nation's efforts are factually flawed), i don't really care that much about the genetic manipulation of cows and what not.  However, last summer Harpers ran a piece &lt;a href="http://www.geocities.com/thetropics/shores/7484/columns/modernpig.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;by Nathanael Johnson called &lt;i&gt;the Swine of the Times: the making of the modern pig&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; in which some very startling and depressing changes are occuring in our food sources.  Among his findings:&lt;blockquote&gt;Geneticists have made great strides in the last decade. The portion of the hog that people can actually eat (as opposed to the skin, bones, and fat) has increased by 1.04 percentâ€”the equivalent of an extra pork chop per pig. Scientists have shaved 12.9 days off the time it takes the animal to reach market weight and increased the area of the loin eye (used as an indicator for general muscle size) by 1.9 centimeters. Sows give birth to an average of 1.56 more piglets per litter. Todayâ€™s pigs are impressively uniform and grow large lean muscles quickly. But the pork has become so lean that packers often have to inject saline marinades directly into the meatâ€”and chefs must drown it in heavy saucesâ€”to make it palatable. Whatâ€™s more, a combination of overâ€“breeding and stressful living conditions makes a percentage of our pork more acidic and less tasty than it used to be.

Standing in an Iowa State University lecture hall, flanked by dual Power Point screens, food scientist Ken Prusa told the swine improvers that the future of the industry lay in providing customers a â€œpositive taste experience.â€ And providing a positive taste experience means providing less acidic pork, Prusa said.

In pork, acids break down muscle tissue, turning it to mush, bleaching it of color and giving it a slightly sour taste. The industry calls this condition â€œpale soft exudativeâ€ or PSE. Prusa held up a plasticâ€“wrapped loin to the audience. The pale meat slumped around his hand.

â€œWhatâ€™s all this reddish liquid sloshing around?â€ he asked.

â€œExudate,â€ someone called out. â€œPurge,â€ said another. â€œWater.â€

â€œRight,â€ Prusa said. To be exact, the fluid is mostly water with some iron, proteins, and trace minerals mixed in. He clicked to a slide showing a microscope photograph of healthy muscle, honeycombed with cell walls. Then he clicked to a picture of pale, soft, exudative meat. The slide showed only a mass of gray.

â€œWhen the cell structure breaks down like this, the meat loses ability to retain water,â€ Prusa said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can only imagine, as we lose more and more of the diversity of our domesticated animal species, that the future of meat proteins begins to look more and more like Soylent Green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving up the eating of most meat and fish, as well as any non-organic dairy (and organic must be California certified as the rest of the nation&#8217;s efforts are factually flawed), i don&#8217;t really care that much about the genetic manipulation of cows and what not.  However, last summer Harpers ran a piece <a href="http://www.geocities.com/thetropics/shores/7484/columns/modernpig.htm" rel="nofollow">by Nathanael Johnson called <i>the Swine of the Times: the making of the modern pig</i></a> in which some very startling and depressing changes are occuring in our food sources.  Among his findings:<br />
<blockquote>Geneticists have made great strides in the last decade. The portion of the hog that people can actually eat (as opposed to the skin, bones, and fat) has increased by 1.04 percentâ€”the equivalent of an extra pork chop per pig. Scientists have shaved 12.9 days off the time it takes the animal to reach market weight and increased the area of the loin eye (used as an indicator for general muscle size) by 1.9 centimeters. Sows give birth to an average of 1.56 more piglets per litter. Todayâ€™s pigs are impressively uniform and grow large lean muscles quickly. But the pork has become so lean that packers often have to inject saline marinades directly into the meatâ€”and chefs must drown it in heavy saucesâ€”to make it palatable. Whatâ€™s more, a combination of overâ€“breeding and stressful living conditions makes a percentage of our pork more acidic and less tasty than it used to be.</p>
<p>Standing in an Iowa State University lecture hall, flanked by dual Power Point screens, food scientist Ken Prusa told the swine improvers that the future of the industry lay in providing customers a â€œpositive taste experience.â€ And providing a positive taste experience means providing less acidic pork, Prusa said.</p>
<p>In pork, acids break down muscle tissue, turning it to mush, bleaching it of color and giving it a slightly sour taste. The industry calls this condition â€œpale soft exudativeâ€ or PSE. Prusa held up a plasticâ€“wrapped loin to the audience. The pale meat slumped around his hand.</p>
<p>â€œWhatâ€™s all this reddish liquid sloshing around?â€ he asked.</p>
<p>â€œExudate,â€ someone called out. â€œPurge,â€ said another. â€œWater.â€</p>
<p>â€œRight,â€ Prusa said. To be exact, the fluid is mostly water with some iron, proteins, and trace minerals mixed in. He clicked to a slide showing a microscope photograph of healthy muscle, honeycombed with cell walls. Then he clicked to a picture of pale, soft, exudative meat. The slide showed only a mass of gray.</p>
<p>â€œWhen the cell structure breaks down like this, the meat loses ability to retain water,â€ Prusa said.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can only imagine, as we lose more and more of the diversity of our domesticated animal species, that the future of meat proteins begins to look more and more like Soylent Green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22744</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22744</guid>
		<description>Yes, the resulting problem with bananas is severe, since they are very prone to diseases that can wipe out huge crops due to lack of diversity.

But cloned plants is not the issue.

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the resulting problem with bananas is severe, since they are very prone to diseases that can wipe out huge crops due to lack of diversity.</p>
<p>But cloned plants is not the issue.</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22743</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/12/27/attack-of-the-clones/#comment-22743</guid>
		<description>Plants grown from cuttings produce cloned food!
I think for most part, bananas are cloned.
Lack of genetic diversity in cultivars is a problem.

E.g.,

http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/no_bananas.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plants grown from cuttings produce cloned food!<br />
I think for most part, bananas are cloned.<br />
Lack of genetic diversity in cultivars is a problem.</p>
<p>E.g.,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/no_bananas.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/no_bananas.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
