Comments on: Shocked Reaction http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/29/shocked-reaction/ Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:42:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Jonathan http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/29/shocked-reaction/#comment-6556 Jonathan Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:52:47 +0000 http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/29/shocked-reaction/#comment-6556 Hi, Thank you for the link. Of course it's both healthy for the subject and myself to be answerable to questioning. If we all believed the same thing then research would be both tedious and slow. Practice will I'm sure make defending this type of reaction easier and I expect more of it in the future. All the best, J Hi,

Thank you for the link. Of course it’s both healthy for the subject and myself to be answerable to questioning. If we all believed the same thing then research would be both tedious and slow. Practice will I’m sure make defending this type of reaction easier and I expect more of it in the future.

All the best,

J

]]> By: spyder http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/29/shocked-reaction/#comment-6528 spyder Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:02:29 +0000 http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/29/shocked-reaction/#comment-6528 <i>If it does not kill you, it will make you strong</i> Or at least provide the "critique" immune system with something to work with in the future. I am curious though, is the apparent animus betwixt the specializations of cosmology physics due to professional jealousies about funding sources, or about core constructs and principles (or both)???? It would seem, from the perspective of the humanities side of campus, that these sorts of dysphemic relations do a disservice to an overall open and diverse inquiry? If it does not kill you, it will make you strong
Or at least provide the “critique” immune system with something to work with in the future. I am curious though, is the apparent animus betwixt the specializations of cosmology physics due to professional jealousies about funding sources, or about core constructs and principles (or both)???? It would seem, from the perspective of the humanities side of campus, that these sorts of dysphemic relations do a disservice to an overall open and diverse inquiry?

]]>