<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tales From The Industry, VIII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tales From The Industry XIV - MANswers - Asymptotia</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-88826</link>
		<dc:creator>Tales From The Industry XIV - MANswers - Asymptotia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-88826</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;ll remember a couple of fun shoots I did last year. I blogged them here and here. I had high hopes that they&#8217;d turn out to be part of something promising. I was (and am) willing to try to bring a little science flavouring to places where it is not normally found, to audiences who don&#8217;t normally seek out science programming. Who knows where that can lead? But&#8230; the show turned out to be, how shall I put it? Low on science and high on&#8230; other stuff, shall we say. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;ll remember a couple of fun shoots I did last year. I blogged them here and here. I had high hopes that they&#8217;d turn out to be part of something promising. I was (and am) willing to try to bring a little science flavouring to places where it is not normally found, to audiences who don&#8217;t normally seek out science programming. Who knows where that can lead? But&#8230; the show turned out to be, how shall I put it? Low on science and high on&#8230; other stuff, shall we say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Calls - Asymptotia</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-53708</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Calls - Asymptotia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-53708</guid>
		<description>[...] Lastly, why was it a bizarre twist that I turned on a reality-show-style competition by accident tonight? Did I just say it as an attempt to make the post interesting? No. It turns out that as a result of some of the TV work I did last year (some posts here and here) a producer from one of those shoots contacted me yesterday to inquire whether I might be interested in taking part in a recording of a show on Saturday. I spoke with him today and they&#8217;ll get back to me if they want me to participate. They&#8217;re still mulling over what they want to do. But guess what kind of show it is, and what I&#8217;d be doing? Well, I&#8217;ll tell you (more details later if I do it). I&#8217;d be a judge on a new reality-show-style competition. Funny old world, isn&#8217;t it? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lastly, why was it a bizarre twist that I turned on a reality-show-style competition by accident tonight? Did I just say it as an attempt to make the post interesting? No. It turns out that as a result of some of the TV work I did last year (some posts here and here) a producer from one of those shoots contacted me yesterday to inquire whether I might be interested in taking part in a recording of a show on Saturday. I spoke with him today and they&#8217;ll get back to me if they want me to participate. They&#8217;re still mulling over what they want to do. But guess what kind of show it is, and what I&#8217;d be doing? Well, I&#8217;ll tell you (more details later if I do it). I&#8217;d be a judge on a new reality-show-style competition. Funny old world, isn&#8217;t it? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tales From The Industry XI - The Universe - Asymptotia</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-45391</link>
		<dc:creator>Tales From The Industry XI - The Universe - Asymptotia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 22:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-45391</guid>
		<description>[...] I like the idea of more TV channels (besides the usual suspects like PBS or Discovery) getting involved in making shows that have more science, so given the end that it serves (see the about page) -and because it is interesting and fun work- I was happy to help out when I got a call to do some interviews to camera for use in the show. (The other show I did some segments for last year -see here and here- turns out to be part of a (reportedly somewhat saucy) variety and comedy show, I&#8217;ve since heard! It will air on another channel in the Fall, and I&#8217;ll tell you more about it then. ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I like the idea of more TV channels (besides the usual suspects like PBS or Discovery) getting involved in making shows that have more science, so given the end that it serves (see the about page) -and because it is interesting and fun work- I was happy to help out when I got a call to do some interviews to camera for use in the show. (The other show I did some segments for last year -see here and here- turns out to be part of a (reportedly somewhat saucy) variety and comedy show, I&#8217;ve since heard! It will air on another channel in the Fall, and I&#8217;ll tell you more about it then. ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Worlds Collide, II - Asymptotia</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-32479</link>
		<dc:creator>When Worlds Collide, II - Asymptotia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-32479</guid>
		<description>[...] Eventually, I began to run into some of the other people on the shoot (uh, the &#8220;talent&#8221; would be the appropriate insider term to use here.), and had a lot of interesting conversations. (This is part of the point of what they want to do with these events too&#8230; give the people they brought together a chance to network). As you may have noticed, I&#8217;ve not mentioned which magazine it is, and I&#8217;m also not going to mention the people who were there either. I promised the magazine&#8217;s editors that I would hold off on that until after the issue appears, since they like to announce their list with a big splash, you see, and I do not want to steal their thunder. Needless to say, there were actors, singers, music producers, etc. You&#8217;ll have heard of some of them (depending upon how close to the pop-culture ground you keep your ear) and you will - I am quite sure - hear of others very soon. Some are already on your tv screens, radio stations, and ipods, and others will be soon. There were also some designers (fashion: clothes, shoes, and accessories), and not all just with the more standard urban, sport, or street references you might expect - there was a broader scope. There were some people running businesses of other sorts too - in fact, tonight I might well check out the restaurant owned by one of the people I met. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eventually, I began to run into some of the other people on the shoot (uh, the &#8220;talent&#8221; would be the appropriate insider term to use here.), and had a lot of interesting conversations. (This is part of the point of what they want to do with these events too&#8230; give the people they brought together a chance to network). As you may have noticed, I&#8217;ve not mentioned which magazine it is, and I&#8217;m also not going to mention the people who were there either. I promised the magazine&#8217;s editors that I would hold off on that until after the issue appears, since they like to announce their list with a big splash, you see, and I do not want to steal their thunder. Needless to say, there were actors, singers, music producers, etc. You&#8217;ll have heard of some of them (depending upon how close to the pop-culture ground you keep your ear) and you will - I am quite sure - hear of others very soon. Some are already on your tv screens, radio stations, and ipods, and others will be soon. There were also some designers (fashion: clothes, shoes, and accessories), and not all just with the more standard urban, sport, or street references you might expect - there was a broader scope. There were some people running businesses of other sorts too - in fact, tonight I might well check out the restaurant owned by one of the people I met. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tales From The Industry X - Wired Science - Asymptotia</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-22227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tales From The Industry X - Wired Science - Asymptotia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-22227</guid>
		<description>[...] I picked one and went with it. I also talked at length to camera about random things that interested me - I think so that they could see what I was like speaking off the cuff. He kept getting me to do the stock line over and over again, and I eventually realised (he confirmed this) that he was trying to get me to do it much BIGGER than I was doing it. Apparently television requires you to just go BIG in order to fit the format. A simple &#8220;Hi&#8221; won&#8217;t do it. You want a &#8220;HI!&#8221;, so that in TV world it will come out as &#8220;Hi&#8221;. I hope that makes sense. I suspect I was rather deficient in that area at the time, since I am much more comfortable with erring on the side of understating (yes, believe it or not). Since I did those spots on the other show I mentioned (here and here), I think I got on the job training about that. It&#8217;s certainly an interesting process. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I picked one and went with it. I also talked at length to camera about random things that interested me - I think so that they could see what I was like speaking off the cuff. He kept getting me to do the stock line over and over again, and I eventually realised (he confirmed this) that he was trying to get me to do it much BIGGER than I was doing it. Apparently television requires you to just go BIG in order to fit the format. A simple &#8220;Hi&#8221; won&#8217;t do it. You want a &#8220;HI!&#8221;, so that in TV world it will come out as &#8220;Hi&#8221;. I hope that makes sense. I suspect I was rather deficient in that area at the time, since I am much more comfortable with erring on the side of understating (yes, believe it or not). Since I did those spots on the other show I mentioned (here and here), I think I got on the job training about that. It&#8217;s certainly an interesting process. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3224</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3224</guid>
		<description>Well thanks. But I hope it is not about being photogenic so much as getting the message across effectively and in an accessible (and inclusive) manner.

Cheers,

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thanks. But I hope it is not about being photogenic so much as getting the message across effectively and in an accessible (and inclusive) manner.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3223</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3223</guid>
		<description>I noticed that Jay Leno had a physicist on The Tonight Show last month.  From the glimpses I've seen on the blog, I'd say you were far more photogenic than that guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that Jay Leno had a physicist on The Tonight Show last month.  From the glimpses I&#8217;ve seen on the blog, I&#8217;d say you were far more photogenic than that guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3219</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 02:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3219</guid>
		<description>There are some things I can't talk about taking shape, actually. More science on TV. Might not come to fruition, probably a long shot in fact,  so let's wait and see what I can tell you. Rest assured that I am not  idle. Any way to get more science out there and I'm there! (Time permitting!)

Cheers,

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some things I can&#8217;t talk about taking shape, actually. More science on TV. Might not come to fruition, probably a long shot in fact,  so let&#8217;s wait and see what I can tell you. Rest assured that I am not  idle. Any way to get more science out there and I&#8217;m there! (Time permitting!)</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3217</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 02:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3217</guid>
		<description>Clifford,

"John, not a star, just a Kuiper Belt Object."

It seems to be a very interesting project.

This may not make you a star, but it could be a good start. If I remember correctly, former Senator Fred Thompson started by playing himself in some movie, while serving in the Senate. He is now playing the district attorney in â€œLaw and Orderâ€, after getting tired of the partisan politics. I think he is doing a quite good job there. Maybe one day you also want to try something new in show business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clifford,</p>
<p>&#8220;John, not a star, just a Kuiper Belt Object.&#8221;</p>
<p>It seems to be a very interesting project.</p>
<p>This may not make you a star, but it could be a good start. If I remember correctly, former Senator Fred Thompson started by playing himself in some movie, while serving in the Senate. He is now playing the district attorney in â€œLaw and Orderâ€, after getting tired of the partisan politics. I think he is doing a quite good job there. Maybe one day you also want to try something new in show business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nc</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>nc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>Hi Lisa,

No, sorry but I don't give autographs in case people practice the signature and use it fraudulently.

Best,
nc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lisa,</p>
<p>No, sorry but I don&#8217;t give autographs in case people practice the signature and use it fraudulently.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
nc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyder</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator>spyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3200</guid>
		<description>Part of the Mac success in this regard might be that Apple makes it all so damn easy.  I sit here with a set of nine discs (two are the DVD tutorial program) that comprise the Final Cut Studio suite (for MacOSX+) of audio/video production software.  You can run the tutorial alongside the application, engaging the processes and techniques with various samples of development work and then practice making stuff. While it is currently rather expensive, those costs always drop when new updates and other apps come online.  I am assuming the HD version will be in the pipe very soon with full Dolby 5.1 and/or 6.0 sound production as well.  How cool is that??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the Mac success in this regard might be that Apple makes it all so damn easy.  I sit here with a set of nine discs (two are the DVD tutorial program) that comprise the Final Cut Studio suite (for MacOSX+) of audio/video production software.  You can run the tutorial alongside the application, engaging the processes and techniques with various samples of development work and then practice making stuff. While it is currently rather expensive, those costs always drop when new updates and other apps come online.  I am assuming the HD version will be in the pipe very soon with full Dolby 5.1 and/or 6.0 sound production as well.  How cool is that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>Can I have your autograph???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I have your autograph???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nc</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3192</link>
		<dc:creator>nc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3192</guid>
		<description>Hi Clifford,

Yes, true for most people!  (But I had to do a course to edit with Quark on Applemacs, probably because I'm more stupid than most people, and was used to PC's.  Can't switch to new things without a gentle introduction.)

Best,
nc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clifford,</p>
<p>Yes, true for most people!  (But I had to do a course to edit with Quark on Applemacs, probably because I&#8217;m more stupid than most people, and was used to PC&#8217;s.  Can&#8217;t switch to new things without a gentle introduction.)</p>
<p>Best,<br />
nc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>Isn't it more to do with the fact that editing and manipulating images and video is just so much more simple and working-out-of-the-box than on other platforms? So people who want to make movies, edit movies, etc, with little or no technical know-how can get up to speed and get the job done, without worrying about the computer stuff. Therefore the mac seems ideal for people working in that Industry, given that the want to edit movies, images, etc, more than most people. The stability, rather pleasing design, etc, all seems a bonus after that.

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it more to do with the fact that editing and manipulating images and video is just so much more simple and working-out-of-the-box than on other platforms? So people who want to make movies, edit movies, etc, with little or no technical know-how can get up to speed and get the job done, without worrying about the computer stuff. Therefore the mac seems ideal for people working in that Industry, given that the want to edit movies, images, etc, more than most people. The stability, rather pleasing design, etc, all seems a bonus after that.</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nc</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3188</link>
		<dc:creator>nc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3188</guid>
		<description>The Graduate:

OK, you need drivers for all the hardware that will run smoothly under the OS.  But that's all!  It's the sheer heaviness of Windows that causes most of the problems, not hardware conflicts; perhaps due to Bill Gates' poor technical leadership (he stopped programming himself around 1983 and devoted his attention to salesmanship), Windows systems grew just like electrical theory:

â€˜Our electrical theory has grown like a ramshackle farmhouse which has been added to, and improved, by the additions of successive tenants to satisfy their momentary needs, and with little regard for the future.â€™

â€“ H.W. Heckstall-Smith, Intermediate Electrical Theory, Dent, London, 1932, p283.

This is exactly what you see in the progression Win95 -&gt; Win98 -&gt; WinME (progressively more unstable and gimmicky, and all obsolete now).  WinXP is built on Win2000 which was based on WinNT, a far more stable platform than the home series 95-ME.  I got my first computer in 1981, but the first time I used Windows was in 1988 during GCSE Computer Studies at school in England.  There was no hard disc drive, so every time you switched on, you had to put in a floppy disc with Windows and then another disc with the application.

It took ages, and the application would then run at about quarter of normal speed (or crash) on top of the Windows platform!  The whole thing was such total rubbish (the mouse slipped, useless gimmick) that I knew it would never become popular, except for secretaries to type letters!  (I was only wrong because of the exponential increases in hardware like processor, memory and HDD capabilities, plus the internet, and the falling cost of all technology.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Graduate:</p>
<p>OK, you need drivers for all the hardware that will run smoothly under the OS.  But that&#8217;s all!  It&#8217;s the sheer heaviness of Windows that causes most of the problems, not hardware conflicts; perhaps due to Bill Gates&#8217; poor technical leadership (he stopped programming himself around 1983 and devoted his attention to salesmanship), Windows systems grew just like electrical theory:</p>
<p>â€˜Our electrical theory has grown like a ramshackle farmhouse which has been added to, and improved, by the additions of successive tenants to satisfy their momentary needs, and with little regard for the future.â€™</p>
<p>â€“ H.W. Heckstall-Smith, Intermediate Electrical Theory, Dent, London, 1932, p283.</p>
<p>This is exactly what you see in the progression Win95 -&gt; Win98 -&gt; WinME (progressively more unstable and gimmicky, and all obsolete now).  WinXP is built on Win2000 which was based on WinNT, a far more stable platform than the home series 95-ME.  I got my first computer in 1981, but the first time I used Windows was in 1988 during GCSE Computer Studies at school in England.  There was no hard disc drive, so every time you switched on, you had to put in a floppy disc with Windows and then another disc with the application.</p>
<p>It took ages, and the application would then run at about quarter of normal speed (or crash) on top of the Windows platform!  The whole thing was such total rubbish (the mouse slipped, useless gimmick) that I knew it would never become popular, except for secretaries to type letters!  (I was only wrong because of the exponential increases in hardware like processor, memory and HDD capabilities, plus the internet, and the falling cost of all technology.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3187</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3187</guid>
		<description>John, not a star, just a &lt;a href="http://asymptotia.com/2006/09/12/clues-in-the-blood-splatter-patterns/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Kuiper Belt Object&lt;/a&gt;.

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, not a star, just a <a href="http://asymptotia.com/2006/09/12/clues-in-the-blood-splatter-patterns/" rel="nofollow">Kuiper Belt Object</a>.</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGraduate</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3185</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGraduate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3185</guid>
		<description>nc:

One thing to keep in mind is that one of the reasons that Macs are so stable is that the hardware and the software come from the same people so there is more opportunity to detect issues.  While operating systems running on PCs are generally expected to run on very, very diverse hardware made by many, many different manufactures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nc:</p>
<p>One thing to keep in mind is that one of the reasons that Macs are so stable is that the hardware and the software come from the same people so there is more opportunity to detect issues.  While operating systems running on PCs are generally expected to run on very, very diverse hardware made by many, many different manufactures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nc</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3182</link>
		<dc:creator>nc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3182</guid>
		<description>"The floor is full of tables all around, mostly occupied with various people sitting at them fiddling with Macs. (Macs everywhere, as Iâ€™ve come to expect from the people in the Industry.) Thereâ€™s a serious-looking table with more senior looking people discussing something in earnest, and another serious-looking table with people editing video on more Macs." - Clifford

It is weird, but somehow Applemacs got in to the art setup early, and retain control.  All publishing is done on Applemacs using Quark's Xpress, just because that was the first stable system in the 1970s or 80s when newspapers and book publishers gave up on hot metal (linotype, monotype machines) and started typesetting.

Because Windows is relatively unstable (prone to get permanently frozen and never unfreeze, requiring reboot and data loss), Applemac retained its hold on the art/publishing industry and later the professional video editing industry, despite successes in the home PC market by Microsoft and Linux.  I think Applemac should produce a PC version of their operating system.  Applemac could never dominate the market if it only sells its own operating system with its own computers.  The hardware specs of Applemac computers have always been poorer than PCs, although because the operating system is better it feels better to use for demanding applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The floor is full of tables all around, mostly occupied with various people sitting at them fiddling with Macs. (Macs everywhere, as Iâ€™ve come to expect from the people in the Industry.) Thereâ€™s a serious-looking table with more senior looking people discussing something in earnest, and another serious-looking table with people editing video on more Macs.&#8221; - Clifford</p>
<p>It is weird, but somehow Applemacs got in to the art setup early, and retain control.  All publishing is done on Applemacs using Quark&#8217;s Xpress, just because that was the first stable system in the 1970s or 80s when newspapers and book publishers gave up on hot metal (linotype, monotype machines) and started typesetting.</p>
<p>Because Windows is relatively unstable (prone to get permanently frozen and never unfreeze, requiring reboot and data loss), Applemac retained its hold on the art/publishing industry and later the professional video editing industry, despite successes in the home PC market by Microsoft and Linux.  I think Applemac should produce a PC version of their operating system.  Applemac could never dominate the market if it only sells its own operating system with its own computers.  The hardware specs of Applemac computers have always been poorer than PCs, although because the operating system is better it feels better to use for demanding applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>So, you are going to be a movie star!! well, TV star! Sounds very exciting, looking forward to seeing you on screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you are going to be a movie star!! well, TV star! Sounds very exciting, looking forward to seeing you on screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I doubt I'll have control over the items. I'm just a player in a larger scheme of things. I sign my rights away.... more or less. If someone finds it interesting enough.... (maybe they'll edit it to have me doing something wrong or funny, for example)... No doubt it will show up there. There might be other projects though...

Thanks for the interest!

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I doubt I&#8217;ll have control over the items. I&#8217;m just a player in a larger scheme of things. I sign my rights away&#8230;. more or less. If someone finds it interesting enough&#8230;. (maybe they&#8217;ll edit it to have me doing something wrong or funny, for example)&#8230; No doubt it will show up there. There might be other projects though&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the interest!</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/comment-page-1/#comment-3168</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/01/tales-from-the-industry-viii/#comment-3168</guid>
		<description>For us readers outside the US, will you put this gem on youtube once it's aired? We're all very intrigued. (Actually when I'm saying we, I can only speak for myself. But I'm sure others agree.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For us readers outside the US, will you put this gem on youtube once it&#8217;s aired? We&#8217;re all very intrigued. (Actually when I&#8217;m saying we, I can only speak for myself. But I&#8217;m sure others agree.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
