<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Positive Sign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tristram Brelstaff</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristram Brelstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>Some people apparently have great difficulty with the idea of zero as a number. Eric Hehner of the University of Toronto tells the following little story:

"In the 1991 Toronto phone book, there is a page that helpfully gives the time difference to various places in the world; to the U.K. it says "+5", and to Costa Rica it says "-1". But to Cuba it says "NA", and the legenda explains "time difference not applicable". By 1996 they tried to correct it; for Cuba it says "=", with the same explanation. In 1997 they discovered the number 0 , but they felt the need then, and still do today, to explain that 0 means "no time difference".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people apparently have great difficulty with the idea of zero as a number. Eric Hehner of the University of Toronto tells the following little story:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the 1991 Toronto phone book, there is a page that helpfully gives the time difference to various places in the world; to the U.K. it says &#8220;+5&#8243;, and to Costa Rica it says &#8220;-1&#8243;. But to Cuba it says &#8220;NA&#8221;, and the legenda explains &#8220;time difference not applicable&#8221;. By 1996 they tried to correct it; for Cuba it says &#8220;=&#8221;, with the same explanation. In 1997 they discovered the number 0 , but they felt the need then, and still do today, to explain that 0 means &#8220;no time difference&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2661</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2661</guid>
		<description>So Paul, Bee,

Perhaps we should use the quaternions and then call them "hypervators". Or "Kahlervators"?

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Paul, Bee,</p>
<p>Perhaps we should use the quaternions and then call them &#8220;hypervators&#8221;. Or &#8220;Kahlervators&#8221;?</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>Grandpa Joe: It's an elevator. 

Willy Wonka: It's a Wonkavator. An elevator can only go up and down, but the Wonkavator can go sideways and slantways and longways and backways... 

Charlie Bucket: And frontways? 

Willy Wonka: ...and squareways and front ways and any other ways that you can think of. It can take you to any room in the whole factory just by pressing one of these buttons. Any of these buttons. Just press a button and *zing*! You're off. And up until now, I've pressed them all... except one. This one. Go ahead, Charlie. 

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067992/quotes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grandpa Joe: It&#8217;s an elevator. </p>
<p>Willy Wonka: It&#8217;s a Wonkavator. An elevator can only go up and down, but the Wonkavator can go sideways and slantways and longways and backways&#8230; </p>
<p>Charlie Bucket: And frontways? </p>
<p>Willy Wonka: &#8230;and squareways and front ways and any other ways that you can think of. It can take you to any room in the whole factory just by pressing one of these buttons. Any of these buttons. Just press a button and *zing*! You&#8217;re off. And up until now, I&#8217;ve pressed them all&#8230; except one. This one. Go ahead, Charlie. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067992/quotes" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067992/quotes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Uitti</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Uitti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>My favorite number is &lt;a href="http://predelusional.blogspot.com/2006/05/counting-on-your-fingers-arithmetic.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;zero&lt;/a&gt;.

It has unique properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite number is <a href="http://predelusional.blogspot.com/2006/05/counting-on-your-fingers-arithmetic.html" rel="nofollow">zero</a>.</p>
<p>It has unique properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2650</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2650</guid>
		<description>Good spot Clifford! It is a very nice sign. The only elevator I know that can go sideways is Willy Wonka's great glass elevator, and perhaps there should be some homage paid a la Harry Potter at King's Cross to it. 

With regard to using the imaginary numbers for a sideways lift, I foresee some difficulties, because sideways moving elevators also should have the technology to move forwards-backwards as well as left-right and up-down, so perhaps we should include time and then use a quaternionic basis?   

Best wishes,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good spot Clifford! It is a very nice sign. The only elevator I know that can go sideways is Willy Wonka&#8217;s great glass elevator, and perhaps there should be some homage paid a la Harry Potter at King&#8217;s Cross to it. </p>
<p>With regard to using the imaginary numbers for a sideways lift, I foresee some difficulties, because sideways moving elevators also should have the technology to move forwards-backwards as well as left-right and up-down, so perhaps we should include time and then use a quaternionic basis?   </p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2642</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2642</guid>
		<description>Hi Clifford,

I am STILL confused that this side of the big water the 1st floor is the basement. I frequently push the wrong buttons in the elevator and then I end up in a laundry room, or in a parking deck. I am waiting for someone to suggest that the 13 is cancelled from the natural numbers, or at least shouldn't be used in schoolbooks or so ;-)

B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clifford,</p>
<p>I am STILL confused that this side of the big water the 1st floor is the basement. I frequently push the wrong buttons in the elevator and then I end up in a laundry room, or in a parking deck. I am waiting for someone to suggest that the 13 is cancelled from the natural numbers, or at least shouldn&#8217;t be used in schoolbooks or so <img src='http://asymptotia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Cole</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2641</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2641</guid>
		<description>The sign at King'sCross is a reference to Harry Potter, not the usual way of numbering rail platforms in the UK! 
I agree wholeheartedly that the negative number at Heathrow is very reassurring for all the reasons mentioned. For some reason the photo reminded me of a sign in an elevator my father told me about. (I think it may have been at his office). It read 'FOR UP PRESS DOWN'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sign at King&#8217;sCross is a reference to Harry Potter, not the usual way of numbering rail platforms in the UK!<br />
I agree wholeheartedly that the negative number at Heathrow is very reassurring for all the reasons mentioned. For some reason the photo reminded me of a sign in an elevator my father told me about. (I think it may have been at his office). It read &#8216;FOR UP PRESS DOWN&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pi_boson</title>
		<link>http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2632</link>
		<dc:creator>pi_boson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asymptotia.com/2006/10/25/a-positive-sign/#comment-2632</guid>
		<description>But who can explain fractional signs? Like the platform number 9+3/4 at London King's Cross. I was always curious who ever named it that way? Here is a picture I googled up:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://dobbin.com/megan/images/london/thumbnails/thumb_100_0037.JPG&#38;imgrefurl=http://dobbin.com/megan/images/london/photos/photo_9.html&#38;h=100&#38;w=75&#38;sz=2&#38;hl=en&#38;start=5&#38;tbnid=U74pul_bmPe-CM:&#38;tbnh=77&#38;tbnw=57&#38;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dkings%2Bcross%2Bplatform%2Bnumber%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26hs%3DrnJ%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official_s%26sa%3DN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But who can explain fractional signs? Like the platform number 9+3/4 at London King&#8217;s Cross. I was always curious who ever named it that way? Here is a picture I googled up:<br />
<a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://dobbin.com/megan/images/london/thumbnails/thumb_100_0037.JPG&amp;imgrefurl=http://dobbin.com/megan/images/london/photos/photo_9.html&amp;h=100&amp;w=75&amp;sz=2&amp;hl=en&amp;start=5&amp;tbnid=U74pul_bmPe-CM:&amp;tbnh=77&amp;tbnw=57&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dkings%2Bcross%2Bplatform%2Bnumber%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26hs%3DrnJ%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official_s%26sa%3DN" rel="nofollow">http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://dobbin.com/megan/images/london/thumbnails/thumb_100_0037.JPG&amp;imgrefurl=http://dobbin.com/megan/images/london/photos/photo_9.html&amp;h=100&amp;w=75&amp;sz=2&amp;hl=en&amp;start=5&amp;tbnid=U74pul_bmPe-CM:&amp;tbnh=77&amp;tbnw=57&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dkings%2Bcross%2Bplatform%2Bnumber%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26hs%3DrnJ%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official_s%26sa%3DN</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
